Gas Mileage

2002 Ford Ranger Pickup 2WD

Research and compare gas mileage for the 2002 Ford Ranger Pickup 2WD

2002 Ford Models

  1. Crown Victoria
  2. Crown Victoria CNG
  3. E150 Club Wagon
  4. E150 Econoline 2WD
  5. E250 Econoline 2WD
  6. Escape 2WD
  7. Escape 4WD
  8. Escort
  9. Escort ZX2
  10. Expedition 2WD
  11. Expedition 4WD
  12. Explorer 2WD
  13. Explorer 4WD
  14. Explorer FFV 4WD
  15. Explorer Sport 2WD
  16. Explorer Sport 4WD
  17. Explorer Sport Trac 2WD
  18. Explorer Sport Trac 4WD
  19. F150 Natural GAS
  20. F150 Pickup 2WD
  21. F150 Pickup 4WD
  22. Focus
  23. Focus Station Wagon
  24. Mustang
  25. Ranger Pickup 2WD
  26. Ranger Pickup 4WD
  27. Taurus
  28. Taurus Wagon
  29. Thunderbird
  30. Windstar FWD Cargo Van
  31. Windstar FWD Wagon
Quick Search:

There is more than one version of this model which have different gas mileage rates. You may select a version below to jump to that section:

Technical Brief (Automatic - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 25 MPG on the highway, 21 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 22 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 19% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
25 MPG
Combined
22 MPG
City
21 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
4
Valves Per Cylinder:
4
Displacement:
2.3 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 31.80 MPG on the highway, 22.80 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 26.13 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 39% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
31.80 MPG
Combined
26.13 MPG
City
22.80 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Automatic
Sub Type:
L5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 28 MPG on the highway, 24 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 25 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 17% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
28 MPG
Combined
25 MPG
City
24 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
4
Valves Per Cylinder:
4
Displacement:
2.3 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 35.27 MPG on the highway, 26.28 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 29.69 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 34% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
35.27 MPG
Combined
29.69 MPG
City
26.28 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Manual
Sub Type:
M5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Automatic - 3.0L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 22 MPG on the highway, 17 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 19 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 29% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
22 MPG
Combined
19 MPG
City
17 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
2
Displacement:
3.0 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 27.90 MPG on the highway, 18.90 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 22.11 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 48% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
27.90 MPG
Combined
22.11 MPG
City
18.90 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Automatic
Sub Type:
L5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Automatic - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 21 MPG on the highway, 17 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 18 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 24% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
21 MPG
Combined
18 MPG
City
17 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
2
Displacement:
4.0 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 27.22 MPG on the highway, 18.42 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21.55 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 48% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
27.22 MPG
Combined
21.55 MPG
City
18.42 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Automatic
Sub Type:
L5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Manual - 3.0L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 22 MPG on the highway, 19 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 20 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 16% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
22 MPG
Combined
20 MPG
City
19 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
2
Displacement:
3.0 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 28.65 MPG on the highway, 20.80 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 23.73 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 38% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
28.65 MPG
Combined
23.73 MPG
City
20.80 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Manual
Sub Type:
M5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Manual - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 22 MPG on the highway, 17 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 19 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 29% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
22 MPG
Combined
19 MPG
City
17 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
2
Displacement:
4.0 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 27.80 MPG on the highway, 19.30 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 22.38 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 44% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
27.80 MPG
Combined
22.38 MPG
City
19.30 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Manual
Sub Type:
M5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Comparisions

2002 Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD

The title for most fuel efficient vehicle in the standard pickup trucks 2wd class in 2002 goes to the Ford Ranger Pickup 2WD with a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 25 miles per gallon. This MPG rating is a full 92% better than the worst in class vehicle, the Ford F150 Natural GAS.

Ford Ranger Pickup 2WD
25 MPG (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
Mazda B2300 2WD
25 MPG (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
Toyota Toyota Tacoma 2WD
24 MPG (Manual - 2.4L - 4 Cylinder)
Mazda B4000 2WD
19 MPG (Manual - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)
Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2WD
18 MPG (Automatic - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)
Toyota Toyota Tundra 2WD
18 MPG (Manual - 3.4L - 6 Cylinder)
Chevrolet C1500 Silverado 2WD
18 MPG (Manual - 4.3L - 6 Cylinder)
Dodge Ram 1500 Pickup 2WD
17 MPG (Automatic - 3.7L - 6 Cylinder)
Lincoln Blackwood 2WD
14 MPG (Automatic - 5.4L - 8 Cylinder)
Ford F150 Natural GAS
13 MPG (Automatic - 5.4L - 8 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage Key