2003 Chrysler Models
There is more than one version of this model which have different gas mileage rates. You may select a version below to jump to that section:
Technical Brief (Automatic - 2.4L - 4 Cylinder - Turbo)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the PT Cruiser gets up to 25 MPG on the highway, 19 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 32% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 25 MPG
- Combined
- 21 MPG
- City
- 19 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
4Valves Per Cylinder:
4Displacement:
2.4 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
YesSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
PremiumGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the PT Cruiser gets up to 32.00 MPG on the highway, 20.98 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 24.82 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 53% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 32.00 MPG
- Combined
- 24.82 MPG
- City
- 20.98 MPG
Transmission
Type:
AutomaticSub Type:
L4Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Front Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Automatic - 2.4L - 4 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the PT Cruiser gets up to 25 MPG on the highway, 20 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 22 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 25% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 25 MPG
- Combined
- 22 MPG
- City
- 20 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
4Valves Per Cylinder:
4Displacement:
2.4 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the PT Cruiser gets up to 32.20 MPG on the highway, 21.70 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 25.43 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 48% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 32.20 MPG
- Combined
- 25.43 MPG
- City
- 21.70 MPG
Transmission
Type:
AutomaticSub Type:
L4Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Front Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Manual - 2.4L - 4 Cylinder - Turbo)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the PT Cruiser gets up to 27 MPG on the highway, 21 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 23 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 29% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 27 MPG
- Combined
- 23 MPG
- City
- 21 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
4Valves Per Cylinder:
4Displacement:
2.4 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
YesSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
PremiumGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the PT Cruiser gets up to 34.24 MPG on the highway, 22.91 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 26.92 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 49% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 34.24 MPG
- Combined
- 26.92 MPG
- City
- 22.91 MPG
Transmission
Type:
ManualSub Type:
M5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Front Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Manual - 2.4L - 4 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the PT Cruiser gets up to 29 MPG on the highway, 21 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 24 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 38% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 29 MPG
- Combined
- 24 MPG
- City
- 21 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
4Valves Per Cylinder:
4Displacement:
2.4 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the PT Cruiser gets up to 36.90 MPG on the highway, 23.70 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 28.25 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 56% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 36.90 MPG
- Combined
- 28.25 MPG
- City
- 23.70 MPG
Transmission
Type:
ManualSub Type:
M5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Front Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownComparisions
2003 Special Purpose Vehicles - Sport Utility Vehicles 2WD
The title for most fuel efficient vehicle in the special purpose vehicles - sport utility vehicles 2wd class in 2003 goes to the Toyota RAV4 2WD with a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 27 miles per gallon. This MPG rating is a full 93% better than the worst in class vehicle, the Lincoln Navigator 2WD.
- Toyota RAV4 2WD
- 27 MPG (Manual - 2.0L - 4 Cylinder)
- Saturn VUE FWD
- 25 MPG (Manual - 2.2L - 4 Cylinder)
- Ford Escape 2WD
- 25 MPG (Manual - 2.0L - 4 Cylinder)
- Ford Explorer Sport 2WD
- 19 MPG (Manual - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)
- Suzuki Grand Vitara XL7
- 19 MPG (Manual - 2.7L - 6 Cylinder)
- GMC Jimmy 2WD
- 19 MPG (Automatic - 4.3L - 6 Cylinder)
- Infiniti FX35 2WD
- 19 MPG (Automatic - 3.5L - 6 Cylinder)
- Cadillac Escalade 2WD
- 15 MPG (Automatic - 5.3L - 8 Cylinder)
- Lincoln Aviator 2WD
- 15 MPG (Automatic - 4.6L - 8 Cylinder)
- Lincoln Navigator 2WD
- 14 MPG (Automatic - 5.4L - 8 Cylinder)
