2004 Ford Models
- Crown Victoria
- E150 Club Wagon
- E150 Econoline 2WD
- E250 Econoline 2WD
- Escape 2WD
- Escape 4WD
- Expedition 2WD
- Expedition 4WD
- Explorer 2WD
- Explorer 4WD
- Explorer FFV 2WD
- Explorer FFV 4WD
- Explorer Sport Trac 2WD FFV
- Explorer Sport Trac 4WD FFV
- F150 Natural GAS
- F150 Pickup 2WD
- F150 Pickup 4WD
- Focus
- Focus Station Wagon
- Freestar Cargo Van FWD
- Freestar Wagon FWD
- Mustang
- Ranger Pickup 2WD
- Ranger Pickup 4WD
- Taurus
- Taurus Wagon
- Thunderbird
There is more than one version of this model which have different gas mileage rates. You may select a version below to jump to that section:
Technical Brief (Automatic - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 26 MPG on the highway, 22 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 24 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 18% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 26 MPG
- Combined
- 24 MPG
- City
- 22 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
4Valves Per Cylinder:
4Displacement:
2.3 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 33.50 MPG on the highway, 24.24 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 27.68 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 38% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 33.50 MPG
- Combined
- 27.68 MPG
- City
- 24.24 MPG
Transmission
Type:
AutomaticSub Type:
L5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 29 MPG on the highway, 24 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 26 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 21% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 29 MPG
- Combined
- 26 MPG
- City
- 24 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
4Valves Per Cylinder:
4Displacement:
2.3 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 37.12 MPG on the highway, 26.15 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 30.16 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 42% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 37.12 MPG
- Combined
- 30.16 MPG
- City
- 26.15 MPG
Transmission
Type:
ManualSub Type:
M5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Automatic - 3.0L - 6 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 22 MPG on the highway, 18 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 19 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 22% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 22 MPG
- Combined
- 19 MPG
- City
- 18 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
6Valves Per Cylinder:
2Displacement:
3.0 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 28.60 MPG on the highway, 19.55 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 22.80 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 46% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 28.60 MPG
- Combined
- 22.80 MPG
- City
- 19.55 MPG
Transmission
Type:
AutomaticSub Type:
L5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Automatic - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 22 MPG on the highway, 17 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 19 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 29% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 22 MPG
- Combined
- 19 MPG
- City
- 17 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
6Valves Per Cylinder:
2Displacement:
4.0 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 27.70 MPG on the highway, 18.50 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21.75 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 50% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 27.70 MPG
- Combined
- 21.75 MPG
- City
- 18.50 MPG
Transmission
Type:
AutomaticSub Type:
L5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Manual - 3.0L - 6 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 23 MPG on the highway, 18 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 20 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 28% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 23 MPG
- Combined
- 20 MPG
- City
- 18 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
6Valves Per Cylinder:
2Displacement:
3.0 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 29.10 MPG on the highway, 19.90 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 23.20 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 46% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 29.10 MPG
- Combined
- 23.20 MPG
- City
- 19.90 MPG
Transmission
Type:
ManualSub Type:
M5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Manual - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 23 MPG on the highway, 17 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 19 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 35% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 23 MPG
- Combined
- 19 MPG
- City
- 17 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
6Valves Per Cylinder:
2Displacement:
4.0 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger Pickup 2WD gets up to 29.20 MPG on the highway, 19.00 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 22.54 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 54% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 29.20 MPG
- Combined
- 22.54 MPG
- City
- 19.00 MPG
Transmission
Type:
ManualSub Type:
M5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownComparisions
2004 Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD
The title for most fuel efficient vehicle in the standard pickup trucks 2wd class in 2004 goes to the Ford Ranger Pickup 2WD with a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 26 miles per gallon. This MPG rating is a full 136% better than the worst in class vehicle, the GM Chevy C2500 HD DED Silverado 2WD.
- Ford Ranger Pickup 2WD
- 26 MPG (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
- Mazda B2300 2WD
- 26 MPG (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
- Toyota Toyota Tacoma 2WD
- 24 MPG (Manual - 2.4L - 4 Cylinder)
- Chevrolet C15 Silverado Hybrid 2WD
- 19 MPG (Automatic - 5.3L - 8 Cylinder)
- Dodge Dakota Pickup 2WD
- 19 MPG (Automatic - 3.7L - 6 Cylinder)
- Mazda B4000 2WD
- 19 MPG (Automatic - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)
- GMC C15 Sierra Hybrid 2WD
- 19 MPG (Automatic - 5.3L - 8 Cylinder)
- Nissan Titan 2WD
- 16 MPG (Automatic - 5.6L - 8 Cylinder)
- Ford F150 Natural GAS
- 14 MPG (Automatic - 5.4L - 8 Cylinder)
- GM Chevy C2500 HD DED Silverado 2WD
- 11 MPG (Automatic - 6.0L - 8 Cylinder)
