Gas Mileage

2004 Isuzu Rodeo 2WD

Research and compare gas mileage for the 2004 Isuzu Rodeo 2WD

2004 Isuzu Models

  1. Ascender 2WD
  2. Ascender 4WD
  3. Ascender 5 Passenger 2WD
  4. Ascender 5 Passenger 4WD
  5. Axiom 2WD
  6. Axiom 4WD
  7. Rodeo 2WD
  8. Rodeo 4WD
Quick Search:

There is more than one version of this model which have different gas mileage rates. You may select a version below to jump to that section:

Technical Brief (Automatic - 3.2L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Rodeo 2WD gets up to 23 MPG on the highway, 18 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 20 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 28% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
23 MPG
Combined
20 MPG
City
18 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
4
Displacement:
3.2 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Rodeo 2WD gets up to 29.40 MPG on the highway, 19.50 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 22.98 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 51% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
29.40 MPG
Combined
22.98 MPG
City
19.50 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Automatic
Sub Type:
L4

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Automatic - 3.5L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Rodeo 2WD gets up to 23 MPG on the highway, 18 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 20 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 28% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
23 MPG
Combined
20 MPG
City
18 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
4
Displacement:
3.5 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Rodeo 2WD gets up to 29.90 MPG on the highway, 20.50 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 23.88 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 46% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
29.90 MPG
Combined
23.88 MPG
City
20.50 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Automatic
Sub Type:
L4

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Manual - 3.2L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Rodeo 2WD gets up to 21 MPG on the highway, 17 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 19 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 24% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
21 MPG
Combined
19 MPG
City
17 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
4
Displacement:
3.2 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Rodeo 2WD gets up to 27.00 MPG on the highway, 19.30 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 22.14 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 40% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
27.00 MPG
Combined
22.14 MPG
City
19.30 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Manual
Sub Type:
M5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Comparisions

2004 Special Purpose Vehicles - Sport Utility Vehicles 2WD

The title for most fuel efficient vehicle in the special purpose vehicles - sport utility vehicles 2wd class in 2004 goes to the Saturn VUE FWD with a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 26 miles per gallon. This MPG rating is a full 73% better than the worst in class vehicle, the Lincoln Navigator 2WD.

Saturn VUE FWD
26 MPG (Manual - 2.2L - 4 Cylinder)
Toyota RAV4 2WD
26 MPG (Automatic - 2.4L - 4 Cylinder)
Chrysler PT Cruiser
25 MPG (Manual - 2.4L - 4 Cylinder)
Chevrolet Blazer 2WD
18 MPG (Automatic - 4.3L - 6 Cylinder)
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD
18 MPG (Automatic - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)
Ford Explorer FFV 2WD
18 MPG (Automatic - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)
Buick Rainier 2WD
18 MPG (Automatic - 4.2L - 6 Cylinder)
Infiniti QX56 2WD
15 MPG (Automatic - 5.6L - 8 Cylinder)
Lincoln Aviator 2WD
15 MPG (Automatic - 4.6L - 8 Cylinder)
Lincoln Navigator 2WD
15 MPG (Automatic - 5.4L - 8 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage Key