2005 Cadillac Models
There is more than one version of this model which have different gas mileage rates. You may select a version below to jump to that section:
Technical Brief (Automatic - 3.6L - 6 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the CTS gets up to 27 MPG on the highway, 18 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 50% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 27 MPG
- Combined
- 21 MPG
- City
- 18 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
6Valves Per Cylinder:
4Displacement:
3.6 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the CTS gets up to 35.20 MPG on the highway, 19.51 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 24.41 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 80% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 35.20 MPG
- Combined
- 24.41 MPG
- City
- 19.51 MPG
Transmission
Type:
AutomaticSub Type:
L5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Front Wheel DrivePassenger Volume (4 Door):
99 Cubic FeetLuggage Volume (4 Door):
13 Cubic FeetTechnical Brief (Manual - 2.8L - 6 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the CTS gets up to 27 MPG on the highway, 17 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 59% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 27 MPG
- Combined
- 21 MPG
- City
- 17 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
6Valves Per Cylinder:
4Displacement:
2.8 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the CTS gets up to 34.50 MPG on the highway, 19.30 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 24.07 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 79% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 34.50 MPG
- Combined
- 24.07 MPG
- City
- 19.30 MPG
Transmission
Type:
ManualSub Type:
M6Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume (4 Door):
99 Cubic FeetLuggage Volume (4 Door):
13 Cubic FeetTechnical Brief (Manual - 3.6L - 6 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the CTS gets up to 27 MPG on the highway, 17 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 20 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 59% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 27 MPG
- Combined
- 20 MPG
- City
- 17 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
6Valves Per Cylinder:
4Displacement:
3.6 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the CTS gets up to 34.00 MPG on the highway, 18.50 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 23.27 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 84% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 34.00 MPG
- Combined
- 23.27 MPG
- City
- 18.50 MPG
Transmission
Type:
ManualSub Type:
M6Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume (4 Door):
99 Cubic FeetLuggage Volume (4 Door):
13 Cubic FeetTechnical Brief (Manual - 5.7L - 8 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the CTS gets up to 23 MPG on the highway, 15 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 18 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 53% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 23 MPG
- Combined
- 18 MPG
- City
- 15 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
8Valves Per Cylinder:
2Displacement:
5.7 LitersGuzzler:
YesTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
PremiumGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the CTS gets up to 29.29 MPG on the highway, 16.63 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 20.65 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 76% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 29.29 MPG
- Combined
- 20.65 MPG
- City
- 16.63 MPG
Transmission
Type:
ManualSub Type:
M6Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume (4 Door):
99 Cubic FeetLuggage Volume (4 Door):
13 Cubic FeetComparisions
2005 Midsize Cars
The title for most fuel efficient vehicle in the midsize cars class in 2005 goes to the Toyota Prius with a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 55 miles per gallon. This MPG rating is a full 358% better than the worst in class vehicle, the Bentley Bentley Arnage.
- Toyota Prius
- 55 MPG (Automatic - 1.5L - 4 Cylinder)
- Volkswagen Passat
- 31 MPG (Automatic - 2.0L - 4 Cylinder)
- Hyundai Elantra
- 30 MPG (Manual - 2.0L - 4 Cylinder)
- Saturn L300
- 23 MPG (Automatic - 3.0L - 6 Cylinder)
- Mercedes Benz E320
- 23 MPG (Automatic - 3.2L - 6 Cylinder)
- Suzuki Verona
- 23 MPG (Automatic - 2.5L - 6 Cylinder)
- Lincoln Mercury Sable
- 23 MPG (Automatic - 3.0L - 6 Cylinder)
- Rolls Royce Phantom
- 15 MPG (Automatic - 6.7L - 12 Cylinder)
- Ferrari Ferrari 612 Scaglietti
- 13 MPG (Manual - 5.7L - 12 Cylinder)
- Bentley Bentley Arnage
- 12 MPG (Automatic - 6.8L - 8 Cylinder)
