2005 Dodge Models
There is more than one version of this model which have different gas mileage rates. You may select a version below to jump to that section:
Technical Brief (Automatic - 3.7L - 6 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Dakota Pickup 2WD gets up to 22 MPG on the highway, 16 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 18 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 38% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 22 MPG
- Combined
- 18 MPG
- City
- 16 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
6Valves Per Cylinder:
2Displacement:
3.7 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Dakota Pickup 2WD gets up to 28.10 MPG on the highway, 18.10 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21.55 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 55% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 28.10 MPG
- Combined
- 21.55 MPG
- City
- 18.10 MPG
Transmission
Type:
AutomaticSub Type:
L4Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Manual - 3.7L - 6 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Dakota Pickup 2WD gets up to 22 MPG on the highway, 16 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 19 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 38% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 22 MPG
- Combined
- 19 MPG
- City
- 16 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
6Valves Per Cylinder:
2Displacement:
3.7 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Dakota Pickup 2WD gets up to 27.84 MPG on the highway, 19.09 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 22.23 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 46% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 27.84 MPG
- Combined
- 22.23 MPG
- City
- 19.09 MPG
Transmission
Type:
ManualSub Type:
M6Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownTechnical Brief (Automatic - 4.7L - 8 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)
The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Dakota Pickup 2WD gets up to 20 MPG on the highway, 15 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 17 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 33% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 20 MPG
- Combined
- 17 MPG
- City
- 15 MPG
Engine
Cylinders:
8Valves Per Cylinder:
2Displacement:
4.7 LitersGuzzler:
NoTurbo:
NoSupercharged:
NoFuel Type:
RegularGas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)
The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Dakota Pickup 2WD gets up to 25.50 MPG on the highway, 16.70 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 19.77 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 53% better than city fuel economy.
- Highway
- 25.50 MPG
- Combined
- 19.77 MPG
- City
- 16.70 MPG
Transmission
Type:
AutomaticSub Type:
L5Miscellaneous
Drive System:
Rear Wheel DrivePassenger Volume :
UnknownLuggage Volume :
UnknownComparisions
2005 Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD
The title for most fuel efficient vehicle in the standard pickup trucks 2wd class in 2005 goes to the Ford Ranger Pickup 2WD with a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 26 miles per gallon. This MPG rating is a full 160% better than the worst in class vehicle, the Chevrolet C2500 HD Silverado 2WD.
- Ford Ranger Pickup 2WD
- 26 MPG (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
- Mazda B2300 2WD
- 26 MPG (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
- Toyota Toyota Tacoma 2WD
- 23 MPG (Automatic - 2.7L - 4 Cylinder)
- Mazda B3000
- 20 MPG (Automatic - 3.0L - 6 Cylinder)
- Chevrolet C15 Silverado Hybrid 2WD
- 19 MPG (Automatic - 5.3L - 8 Cylinder)
- Dodge Dakota Pickup 2WD
- 19 MPG (Manual - 3.7L - 6 Cylinder)
- GMC C15 Sierra Hybrid 2WD
- 19 MPG (Automatic - 5.3L - 8 Cylinder)
- Nissan Titan 2WD
- 16 MPG (Automatic - 5.6L - 8 Cylinder)
- GMC C2500 HD Sierra 2WD
- 10 MPG (Automatic - 6.0L - 8 Cylinder)
- Chevrolet C2500 HD Silverado 2WD
- 10 MPG (Automatic - 6.0L - 8 Cylinder)
