Gas Mileage

2008 Ford Ranger 2WD

Research and compare gas mileage for the 2008 Ford Ranger 2WD

2008 Ford Models

  1. Crown Victoria FFV
  2. Edge AWD
  3. Edge FWD
  4. Escape 4WD
  5. Escape FWD
  6. Escape Hybrid 4WD
  7. Escape Hybrid FWD
  8. Expedition 2WD
  9. Explorer 2WD
  10. Explorer 4WD
  11. Explorer Sport Trac 2WD
  12. Explorer Sport Trac 4WD
  13. F150 FFV 2WD
  14. F150 FFV 4WD
  15. F150 Pickup 2WD
  16. F150 Pickup 4WD
  17. F150 STX SE 2WD
  18. F150 STX SE 2WD FFV
  19. Focus FWD
  20. Fusion AWD
  21. Fusion FWD
  22. Mustang
  23. Ranger 2WD
  24. Ranger 4WD
  25. Taurus AWD
  26. Taurus FWD
  27. Taurus X AWD
  28. Taurus X FWD
Quick Search:

There is more than one version of this model which have different gas mileage rates. You may select a version below to jump to that section:

Technical Brief (Automatic - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 24 MPG on the highway, 19 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 26% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
24 MPG
Combined
21 MPG
City
19 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
4
Valves Per Cylinder:
4
Displacement:
2.3 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 32.95 MPG on the highway, 23.25 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 26.80 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 42% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
32.95 MPG
Combined
26.80 MPG
City
23.25 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Automatic
Sub Type:
L5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 26 MPG on the highway, 21 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 23 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 24% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
26 MPG
Combined
23 MPG
City
21 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
4
Valves Per Cylinder:
4
Displacement:
2.3 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 36.80 MPG on the highway, 26.50 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 30.32 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 39% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
36.80 MPG
Combined
30.32 MPG
City
26.50 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Manual
Sub Type:
M5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Automatic - 3.0L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 20 MPG on the highway, 15 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 17 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 33% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
20 MPG
Combined
17 MPG
City
15 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
2
Displacement:
3.0 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 27.62 MPG on the highway, 18.25 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21.54 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 51% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
27.62 MPG
Combined
21.54 MPG
City
18.25 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Automatic
Sub Type:
L5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Automatic - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 20 MPG on the highway, 15 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 17 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 33% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
20 MPG
Combined
17 MPG
City
15 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
2
Displacement:
4.0 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 27.20 MPG on the highway, 18.80 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21.83 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 45% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
27.20 MPG
Combined
21.83 MPG
City
18.80 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Automatic
Sub Type:
L5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Manual - 3.0L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 22 MPG on the highway, 16 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 18 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 38% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
22 MPG
Combined
18 MPG
City
16 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
2
Displacement:
3.0 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 29.84 MPG on the highway, 19.93 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 23.43 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 50% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
29.84 MPG
Combined
23.43 MPG
City
19.93 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Manual
Sub Type:
M5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Technical Brief (Manual - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)

Gas Mileage (EPA Estimated)

The figures below show what the EPA estimates drivers will experience for fuel economy in "real world" driving situations. This version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 20 MPG on the highway, 15 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 17 MPG. Highway fuel economy is a full 33% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
20 MPG
Combined
17 MPG
City
15 MPG

Engine

Cylinders:
6
Valves Per Cylinder:
2
Displacement:
4.0 Liters
Guzzler:
No
Turbo:
No
Supercharged:
No
Fuel Type:
Regular

Gas Mileage (EPA Unadjusted)

The figures below show what the EPA observed for fuel economy in labratory tests. These mileages are not typical of "real world" driving fuel economy. In the lab, this version of the Ranger 2WD gets up to 27.70 MPG on the highway, 18.50 MPG under city driving conditions, and an estimated combined rating of 21.75 MPG. Labratory highway fuel economy is a full 50% better than city fuel economy.

Highway
27.70 MPG
Combined
21.75 MPG
City
18.50 MPG

Transmission

Type:
Manual
Sub Type:
M5

Miscellaneous

Drive System:
Rear Wheel Drive
Passenger Volume :
Unknown
Luggage Volume :
Unknown

Comparisions

2008 Small Pickup Trucks 2WD

The title for most fuel efficient vehicle in the small pickup trucks 2wd class in 2008 goes to the Ford Ranger 2WD with a combined EPA fuel economy rating of 23 miles per gallon. This MPG rating is a full 53% better than the worst in class vehicle, the Chevrolet Colorado Cab Chassis Inc 2WD.

Ford Ranger 2WD
23 MPG (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
Mazda B2300 2WD
23 MPG (Manual - 2.3L - 4 Cylinder)
Toyota Toyota Tacoma 2WD
22 MPG (Manual - 2.7L - 4 Cylinder)
GMC Canyon Crew Cab 2WD
20 MPG (Automatic - 2.9L - 4 Cylinder)
Isuzu I 290 2WD Ext Cab
20 MPG (Automatic - 2.9L - 4 Cylinder)
Chevrolet Colorado 2WD
20 MPG (Automatic - 2.9L - 4 Cylinder)
Chevrolet Colorado Crew Cab 2WD
20 MPG (Automatic - 2.9L - 4 Cylinder)
Mazda B4000 2WD
17 MPG (Automatic - 4.0L - 6 Cylinder)
GMC Canyon Cab Chassis Inc 2WD
15 MPG (Automatic - 3.7L - 5 Cylinder)
Chevrolet Colorado Cab Chassis Inc..
15 MPG (Automatic - 3.7L - 5 Cylinder)
Gas Mileage Key